• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

Alston & Bird Consumer Finance ABstract

  • Home
  • Services
  • Contacts

CFPB Issues New Edition of Supervisory Highlights

December 14, 2019 By Morey Barnes Yost

Supreme Court

A&B ABstract:

 The Fall 2019 edition of the CFPB’s Supervisory Highlights focuses on credit reporting issues of interest.

Discussion

The Fall 2019 edition of Supervisory Highlights represents the second time the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”)  has focused entirely on credit reporting.  With respect to furnishers, the Supervisory Highlights includes five categories of supervisory observations relating to compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) and its implementing Regulation V and associated compliance management system weaknesses.

Policies and Procedures

 Under Regulation V, a furnisher must establish and implement reasonable written policies and procedures regarding the accuracy and integrity of the consumer information it provides to consumer reporting companies (“CRCs”).  Related examination findings by the CFPB include:

  • Mortgage industry furnishers failed to have policies and procedures appropriate to the nature, size, complexity, and scope of their activities;
  • The policies and procedures of auto loan furnishers failed to provide sufficient guidance on the conduct of “reasonable investigations of indirect disputes that contain allegations of identity theft”; and
  • Debt collection furnishers failed to have policies and procedures that differentiated between FCRA disputes, disputes under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and debt validation requests.

The CFPB also addressed examination findings for furnishers of deposit account information.

Reporting Information with Actual Knowledge of Errors

 Under FCRA, a furnisher cannot furnish information relating to a consumer that it “knows or has reasonable cause to believe … is inaccurate,” unless the furnisher clearly and conspicuously discloses to the consumer an address to which the consumer can send notice that specific information is inaccurate.

The CFPB found that one or more furnishers violated this prohibition by reporting to CRCs accounts with derogatory status codes that were inaccurate because of coding errors, and that the furnishers knew or had reasonable cause to believe were inaccurate.  Further, these furnishers failed: (1) in investigating disputes of such information to conduct a root-cause analysis that would have identified the source of the issue; and (2) to provide consumers with a clear and conspicuous disclosure of the address to which they could send notices of dispute.

Duty to Correct and Update Information

 A furnisher must promptly notify a CRC if it determines that information provided to the CRC is incomplete or inaccurate, and must make any corrections or addition to the information to correct the issue.  The CFPB identified examples of auto loan and deposit account furnishers who violated this duty.

Duty to Provide Notice of Delinquency of Accounts

 FCRA imposes on furnishers a duty to report the date of first delinquency – defined as “the month and year of commencement of the delinquency on the account that immediately preceded the action” – to a CRC within 90 days.  The CFPB identified instances of furnishers incorrectly reporting the date of delinquency

Obligations Upon Notice of Dispute

 The final category of findings in connection with the activities of furnishers is obligations upon notice of dispute.  If a consumer disputes the accuracy of information contained in a consumer report, FCRA and Regulation V require a furnisher to conduct a reasonable investigation of the dispute.

Among other issues, the CFPB noted that furnishers violated this duty by:

  • Failing to conduct reasonable investigations of both direct and indirect disputes;
  • Failing to timely complete dispute investigations within the timeframe established by Regulation V (generally 30 days); or
  • Failing to notify consumers of a determination that a dispute is frivolous or irrelevant (and that, as a result, the furnisher will not undertake an investigation).

Takeaway

As the second edition dedicated to consumer reporting, these Supervisory Highlights puts furnishers and CRCs that this is an area of focus for the CFPB.  Building on the credit reporting supervisory observations in the Summer 2019 edition, furnishers – banks, mortgage servicers, auto loan servicers, student loan servicers, and debt collectors – should take the opportunity to evaluate their own policies, procedures, and processes for compliance with FCRA and Regulation V.

Filed Under: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Tagged With: #FCRA, #furnishers, #SupervisoryHighlights

About Morey Barnes Yost

Morey Barnes Yost is a member of Alston & Bird’s Financial Services & Products Group and the Consumer Financial Services Team. She advises clients on a broad range of federal and state regulatory compliance matters relating to consumer financial services, including the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Truth in Lending Act and state mortgage lending, servicing, appraisal and appraisal management company (AMC) statutes.

[Read Bio]

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. 2tomorrow says:
    February 17, 2022 at 9:23 am

    2explaining

Primary Sidebar

RECEIVE EMAIL NOTIFICATIONS WHEN NEW POSTS ARE ADDED.

A confirmation email has been sent to the email address provided.


Tags

#California #CCPA #CFPA #CFPB #COVID=19 #debtcollection #evaluations #FCRA #FDCPA #GSEs #HECM #Massachusetts #mortgageservicing #NYDFS #Part419 #Privacy #QMPatch #SupervisoryHighlights #validwhenmade Ability to Repay abusive ATR/QM CARES Act Case law Covid-19 Credit Reporting CSBS Cybersecurity data breach Debt Collection DOJ Eleventh Circuit FACTA Forbearance Foreclosure HUD Mortgage Servicing passive investors QM QM Patch Regulation F SCRA Servicing student loan servicing UDAAP

Secondary Sidebar

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Client Advisory: One Person’s Junk Fee Is Another’s Treasure
  • Utah to regulate smaller commercial non-real estate secured financings
  • PAVE Task Force Issues Action Plan to Address Appraisal Bias
  • CFPB Issues Bulletin About Auto Repossession, Congressional Republicans Respond
  • New York Amends Contact Requirements for Certain Delinquent Borrowers
Copyright © 2022 · Alston & Bird · All Rights Reserved. Privacy.