• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

Alston & Bird Consumer Finance ABstract

  • Home
  • Services
  • Contacts

Rhode Island Requires Licensure for Virtual Currency Business Activity

August 5, 2019 By Jessica Keenum

A&B Abstract:

Effective January 1, 2020, Rhode Island will regulate virtual currency under its money transmission laws.

Background

Forty-nine states and the District of Columbia regulate money transmission.  Almost all of those jurisdictions have different definitions and exemptions that determine whether their laws apply to certain businesses or activities. The result is a complex, patchwork regulatory landscape. Further complicating the issue is the question of whether virtual currency is considered money or monetary value for purposes of current state money transmitter laws.

States have started to answer this question. Through official guidance, regulatory agency opinion letters, and/or legislation, states are clarifying whether their laws apply to the sale, exchange or transfer of virtual currency.  On July 15, Rhode Island’s governor signed House Bill 5847, which clarifies that certain virtual currency business activities will be subject to the state’s money transmitter regime.  The measure also adds provisions to the current law related to currency transmissions and licensing requirements.

What Activity Is Regulated?

The bill generally requires a person engaging in “currency transmission” for a fee or other consideration to be licensed with the state. “Currency transmission” explicitly includes “maintaining control of virtual currency or transactions in virtual currency on behalf of others.” The bill provides several exemptions from licensure requirements, including for persons using virtual currency for personal, family or household purposes.

For purposes of the bill, virtual currency means “a digital representation of value that: (A)[i]s used as a medium of exchange, unit of account, or store of value; and (B) [i]s not legal tender, whether or not denominated in legal tender.” The definition excludes:

  • rewards or affinity program value that cannot be taken from or exchanged with the merchant for “legal tender, bank credit or virtual currency;”
  • digital representations of value used within online games;
  • “[n]ative digital token used in a proprietary blockchain service platform;” and
  • gift certificates, gift cards, and general-use prepaid cards.

The bill requires licensees engaging in virtual currency business activities to provide certain specified disclosures to residents.  Further, licensees must create and maintain certain compliance programs, including business continuity and disaster recovery programs, anti-fraud programs, anti money-laundering programs and information and operational security programs.

Filed Under: Licensing, State Law Tagged With: Money transmitter, Rhode Island, virtual currency

About Jessica Keenum

Jessica Garcia Keenum is a senior associate with the Financial Services & Products Group and a member of Alston & Bird’s Payment Systems Team. She advises financial institutions, merchants, and other payments systems clients with a variety of transactional and regulatory matters.

[Read Bio]

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Rhode Island Will Regulate Crypto Under Money Transmitter Laws | TheCryptoReport.com says:
    May 31, 2020 at 4:16 pm

    […] to a report published August 5 from Alston and Bird, an international law firm, any business that accepts fees […]

  2. URL says:
    June 6, 2021 at 2:46 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Informations on that Topic: alstonconsumerfinance.com/rhode-island-requires-licensure-for-virtual-currency-business-activity/ […]

  3. 2right-hand says:
    February 17, 2022 at 10:13 am

    2afghanistan

Primary Sidebar

RECEIVE EMAIL NOTIFICATIONS WHEN NEW POSTS ARE ADDED.

A confirmation email has been sent to the email address provided.


Tags

#California #CCPA #CFPA #CFPB #COVID=19 #debtcollection #evaluations #FCRA #FDCPA #GSEs #HECM #Massachusetts #mortgageservicing #NYDFS #Part419 #Privacy #QMPatch #SupervisoryHighlights #validwhenmade Ability to Repay abusive ATR/QM CARES Act Case law Covid-19 Credit Reporting CSBS Cybersecurity data breach Debt Collection DOJ Eleventh Circuit FACTA Forbearance Foreclosure HUD Mortgage Servicing passive investors QM QM Patch Regulation F SCRA Servicing student loan servicing UDAAP

Secondary Sidebar

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Client Advisory: One Person’s Junk Fee Is Another’s Treasure
  • Utah to regulate smaller commercial non-real estate secured financings
  • PAVE Task Force Issues Action Plan to Address Appraisal Bias
  • CFPB Issues Bulletin About Auto Repossession, Congressional Republicans Respond
  • New York Amends Contact Requirements for Certain Delinquent Borrowers
Copyright © 2022 · Alston & Bird · All Rights Reserved. Privacy.